Option 2: Only boot .efi file with valid signature. However, users have reported issues with Ventoy not working properly and encountering booting issues. Guid For Ventoy With Secure Boot in UEFI 1All the steps bellow only need to be done once for each computer when booting Ventoy at the first time. However, after adding firmware packages Ventoy complains Bootfile not found. This option is enabled by default since 1.0.76. arnaud. Fix PC issues and remove viruses now in 3 easy steps: download and install Ventoy on Windows 10/11, Brother Printer Paper Jam: How to Easily Clear It, Fix Missing Dll Files in Windows 10 & Learn what Causes that. So by default, you need to disabled secure boot in BIOS before boot Ventoy in UEFI mode. With that with recent versions, all seems to work fine. Any suggestions, bugs? edited edited edited edited Sign up for free . It supports x86 Legacy BIOSx86 Legacy BIOS,x86_64 UEFIx86_64 UEFI, ARM64 UEFI, IA32 UEFI and MIPS64EL UEFI. Hello , Thank you very very much for your testings and reports. By clicking Sign up for GitHub, you agree to our terms of service and ventoy maybe the image does not support x64 uefi - FOTO SKOLA My guesd is it does not. @chromer030 hello. Again, the major problem I see with this fine discussion is that everybody appears to be tiptoeing around the fact that some users have no clue what Secure Boot is intended for (only that, because it says "Secure" they don't want to turn it off), and, rather than trying to educate them about that, we're trying to find ways to keep them "feeling safe" when the choices they might make would leave their system anything but. Probably you didn't delete the file completely but to the recycle bin. Delete the Ventoy secure boot key to fix this issue. I didn't expect this folder to be an issue. The best workaround is to install some Linux variant (I use Fedora but Ubuntu and SUSE are supported) and install VirtualBox. Reply. And I will posit that if someone sees it differently, or tries to justify the current behaviour of Ventoy, of letting any untrusted bootloaders pass through when Secure Boot is enabled, they don't understand trust chains, whereas this is pretty much the base of any computer security these days. What's going on here? You answer my questions and then I will answer yours MEMZ.img was listed with no changes for me. Boots, but cannot find root device. As with pretty much any other security solution, the point of Secure Boot is mitigation ("If you have enabled Secure Boot then it means you want to be notified about bootloaders that do not match the signatures you allow") and right now, Ventoy results in a complete bypass of this mitigation, which is why I raised this matter. No bootfile found for UEFI! Would MS sign boot code which can change memory/inject user files, write sectors, etc.? For instance, if you download a Windows or Linux ISO, you sure want to find out if someone altered the official bootloader, that was put there by the people who created the ISO, because it might tell you if something was maliciously inserted there. It should be the default of Ventoy, which is the point of this issue. Have a question about this project? @ventoy Customizing installed software before installing LM. This could be useful for data recovery, OS re-installation, or just for booting from USB without thinking about additional steps. Let us know in the comments which solution worked for you. Please refer When Ventoy2Disk.exe Failed to Install, Please refer When Ventoy2Disk.exe Fail to Update, Yes. Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1401532. etc. It only causes problems. list vol - select vol of EFI (in my case nr 14) as illustrated - assign - EFI drive is mounted as Q: Also possible is: After booting with Win10XPE from RAMDISK the Hidden EFI Driv to be used in Super GRUB2 Disk. 6. The current Secure Boot implementation should be renamed from "Secure Boot support" to "Secure Boot circumvention/bypass", the documentation should state about its pros and cons, and Ventoy should probably ask to delete enrolled key (or at least include KeyTool, it's open-source). New version of Rescuezilla (2.4) not working properly. When the user select option 1. This means current is ARM64 UEFI mode. I've made another patched preloader with Secure Boot support. Shims and other Secure Boot signed chain loaders do not remove the feature of warning about boot loaders that have not been signed (by either MS or the Shim holders). Yep, the Rescuezilla v2.4 thing is not a problem with Ventoy. puedes poner cualquier imagen en 32 o 64 bits Results when tested on different models\types of x86 computers - amount of RAM, make/model, latest BIOS? and leave it up to the user. Sign in That doesn't mean that it cannot validate the booloaders that are being chainloaded. In that case there's no difference in booting from USB or plugging in a SATA or NVMe drive with the same content as you'd put on USB (and we can debate about intrusion detection if you want). I will test it in a realmachine later. Oooh, ok, I read up a bit on how PCR registers work during boot, and now it makes much more sense. Windows 11 21h2 x64 Hebrew - Successfully tested on UFEI. Tested on ASUS K40IN Sorry, I meant to upgrade from the older version of Windows 11 to 22H2. Have a question about this project? I can confirm it was the reason for some ISOs to not boot (ChimeraOS, Manjaro Gnome). No boot file found for UEFI (Arch installation) - reddit Most likely it was caused by the lack of USB 3.0 driver in the ISO. Ventoy loads Linux kernels directly, which are also signed with embedded Shim certificate (not with the certificate trusted by EFI DB). Ventoy is an open source tool that lets you create a bootable USB drive for ISO files. Freebsd has some linux compatibility and also has proprietary nvidia drivers. Do NOT put the file to the 32MB VTOYEFI partition. When it asks Delete the key (s), select Yes. Ventoy 1.0.55: bypass Windows 11 requirements check during installation @pbatard accomodate this. Firstly, I run into the MOKManager screen and enroll the testkey-ventoy.der and reboot. *far hugh* -> Covid-19 *bg*. Ventoy Win10_1909_Chinese(Simplified)_x64.iso: Works fine, all hard drive can be properly detected. relativo a la imagen iso a utilizar snallinux-.6-x86_64.iso - 1.40 GB Astra Linux , supports UEFI , booting successfully. Adding an efi boot file to the directory does not make an iso uefi-bootable. Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI." UEFI64 Bootfile \EFI\Boot\bootx64.efi is present. If you use Rufus to write the same ISO file to the same USB stick and boot in your computer. It also happens when running Ventoy in QEMU. Anything Debian-based fails to boot for me across two computers and several versions of Ventoy. Maybe the image does not support x64 uefi . So all Ventoy's behavior doesn't change the secure boot policy. These WinPE have different user scripts inside the ISO files. Again, it doesn't matter whether you believe it makes sense to have Secure Boot enabled or not. FreeBSD 13.1-RELEASE Aarch64 fails to boot saying "No bootfile found for UEFI!". privacy statement. If a user is booting a lot of unsigned bootloaders with Secure Boot enabled, they clearly should disable Secure Boot in their settings, because, for what they are doing, it is pretty much pointless. It's what Secure Boot is designed to do on account of being a trust chain mechanism that, when enabled, MUST alert if trust is broken. I have the same error, I can boot from the same usb, the same iso file and the same Ventoy on asus vivobook but not on asus ROG. Yes, anybody can make a UEFI bootloader that chain loads unsigned bootloaders with the express purpose of defeating Secure Boot. My guesd is it does not. So the new ISO file can be booted fine in a secure boot enviroment. unsigned .efi file still can not be chainloaded. Paragon ExtFS for Windows
Where can I download MX21_February_x64.iso? EDIT: chromeos_14816.99.0_reven_recovery_stable-channel_mp-v2.bin fails to boot on BIOS & UEFI. On one of my Laptop Problem with HBCD_PE_x64.iso Uefi on start from Desktop error with Autoit v3: Pintool.exe Application error. The MX21_February_x64.iso seems OK in VirtualBox for me. DokanMounter
There are many kinds of WinPE. en_windows_10_business_editions_version_1909_updated_april_2020_x64_dvd_aa945e0d.iso | 5 GB, en_windows_10_business_editions_version_2004_x64_dvd_d06ef8c5.iso | 5 GB Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. what is the working solution? They boot from Ventoy just fine. Edit ISO - no UEFI - forums.ventoy.net fails to find system in /slax, 'Hello System' os can boot successfully with bootx64.efi's machine and show desktop. So even when someone physically unplugs my SSD and installs a malicious bootloader/OS to it, it won't be able to decrypt the main OS partition. No. @rderooy try to use newest version, I've been trying on a Dell XPS 13 9360 with Ventoy 1.0.34 UEFI running and Memtest86-4.3.7.iso does not work. I can guarantee you that if you explain the current situation to the vast majority of Ventoy users who enrolled it in a Secure Boot environment, they will tell you that this is not what they expected at all and that what they want, once enrolled, is for Ventoy to only let through UEFI boot loaders that can be validated for Secure Boot and produce the expected Secure Boot warning for the ones that don't. Many thousands of people use Ventoy, the website has a list of tested ISOs. I think it's OK. can u test ? How to Download Windows 11 ISO and Perform a Clean Install | Beebom PS: It works fine with original ventoy release (use UEFIinSecureBoot) when Secure boot is enabled. Let the user access their computer (fat chance they're going to remove the heatsink and thermal paste to see if their CPU was changed, especially if, as far as they are concerned, no change as occurred and both the computer appearance and behaviour are indistinguishable from usual). Inspection of the filesystem within the iso image shows the boot file(s) - including the UEFI bootfile - in the respective directory. Is there a way to force Ventoy to boot in Legacy mode? backbox-7-desktop-amd64.iso - 2.47 GB, emmabuntus-de3-amd64-10.3-1.01.iso - 3.37 GB, pentoo-full-amd64-hardened-2019.2.iso - 4 GB 10 comments andycuong commented on Mar 17, 2021 completed meeuw mentioned this issue on Jul 31, 2021 [issue]: Can't boot Ventoy UEFI Native (Without CSM) on HP ProBook 640g1 #1031 Is there any progress about secure boot support? And they can boot well when secure boot is enabled, because they use bootmgr.efi directly from Windows iso. Download non-free firmware archive. And for good measure, clone that encrypted disk again. I'm hoping other people can test and report because it will most likely be a few weeks before this can make it to the top of my priority list @ventoy, are you interested in a proper implementation of Secure Boot support? to your account, Hi ! Adding an efi boot file to the directory does not make an iso uefi-bootable. GRUB2, from my experiences does this automatically. What matters is what users perceive and expect. openSUSE-Tumbleweed-XFCE-Live-x86_64-Snapshot20200402-Media - 925 MB, star-kirk-2.1.0-xfce-amd64-live.iso - 518 MB, Porteus-CINNAMON-v5.0rc1-x86_64.iso - 300 MB And it's possible that the UEFI specs went as far as specifying that specific aspects of the platform security, such as disk encryption through TPM, should only be available if Secure Boot is enabled. But it shouldn't be to the user to do that. After boot into the Ventoy main menu, pay attention to the lower left corner of the screen:
That is just to make sure it has really written the whole Ventoy install onto the usb stick. I am getting the same error, and I confirmed that the iso has UEFI support. In a real use case, when you have several Linux distros (not all of which have Secure Boot support), several unsigned UEFI utilities, it's just easier to temporary disable Secure Boot with SUISBD method. its existence because of the context of the error message. The virtual machine cannot boot. If a user whitelists Ventoy using MokManager, it's because they want the Ventoy bootloader to run in a Secure Boot environment and want it to only chain load boot loaders that meet the Secure Boot requirements. Ventoy has added experimental support for IA32 UEFI since v1.0.30. It works for me if rename extension to .img - tested on a Lenovo IdeaPad 300. Hi, HDClone 9.0.11 ISO is stating on UEFI succesfully but on Legacy after choose "s" or "x64" to start hdclone it open's a black windows in front of the Ventoy Menu and noting happens more. How to Fix No bootfile found for UEFI on a Laptop or Desktop PC - YouTube You can put the iso file any where of the first partition. Thus, on a system where Secure Boot is enabled, users should rightfully expect to be alerted if the EFI bootloader of an ISO booted through Ventoy is not Secure Boot signed or if its signature doesn't validate. https://abf.openmandriva.org/platforms/cooker/products/4/product_build_lists/3250 BIOS Mode Both Partition Style GPT Disk . You were able to use TPM for disk encryption long before Secure Boot, and rightfully so, since the process of storing and using data encryption keys is completely different from the process of storing and using trust chain keys to validate binary executables (being able to decrypt something is very different from being able to trust something). If everything is fine, I'll prepare the repo, prettify the code and write detailed compilation and usage instructions, as well as help @ventoy with integration. Now, that one can currently break the trust chain somewhere down the line, by inserting a malicious program at the first level where the trust stops being validated, which, incidentally, as a method (since I am NOT calling Ventoy malicious here) is very similar to what Ventoy is doing for Windows boot, is irrelevant to the matter, because one can very much conceive an OS that is being secured all the way (and, once again, if Microsoft were to start doing just that, then that would most likely mark the end of being able to use Ventoy with Windows ISOs since it would no longer be able to inject an executable that isn't signed by Microsoft as part of the boot process) and that validates the signature of every single binary it runs along the way which means that the trust chain needs to start somewhere and (as far as user providable binaries are concerned) that trust chain starts with Secure Boot. I made a VHD of an arch installation and installed the vtoyboot mod and it keeps on giving me the no UEFI error. Ventoy No Boot File Found For Uefi - My Blog Have you tried grub mode before loading the ISO? So it is pointless for Ventoy to only boot Secure EFI files once the user has 'whitelisted' it. As Ventoy itself is not signed with Microsoft key. Maybe the image does not support x64 uefi. This means current is Legacy BIOS mode. wifislax64-2.1-final.iso - 2 GB, obarun-JWM-2020.03.01-x86_64.iso - 1.6 GB, MiniTool_Partition_Wizard_10.2.3_Technician_WinPE.iso - 350 MB, artix-cinnamon-s6-20200210-x86_64.iso - 1.88 GB, Parrot-security-4.8_x64.iso - 4.03 GB If Ventoy was intended to be used from an internal hard disk, I would agree with you, but Ventoy is a USB-based multiboot solution and therefore the user must have physical access to the system, so it is the users responsibility to be careful about what he inserts into that USB port. Parrot-security-4.9.1_x64.iso - 3.8 GB, eos-eos3.7-amd64-amd64.200310-013107.base.iso - 2.83 GB, minimal_linux_live_15-Dec-2019_64-bit_mixed.iso - 18.9 MB, OracleLinux-R7-U3-Server-x86_64-dvd.iso - 4.64 GB, backbox-6-desktop-amd64.iso - 2.51 GB There are two bugs in Ventoy: Unsigned bootloader Linux ISOs or ISOs without UEFI support does not boot with Secure Boot enabled. Currently when boot the ISO file failed as a Virtual CDROM, Ventoy will try to parse the grub configuration file inside the ISO file and try to boot it direclty with. Google for how to make an iso uefi bootable for more info. Menu Option-->Secure Boot Support for Ventoy2Disk.exe and -s option for Ventoy2Disk.sh ParagonMounter
Legacy\UEFI32\UEFI64 boot? @steve6375 I've mounted that partition and deleted EFI folder but it's still recognized as EFI, both in Windows Disk Management and the BIOS, just doesn't boot anymore. I didn't try install using it though. preloader-for-ventoy-prerelease-1.0.40.zip This means current is 32bit UEFI mode. Yes, I already understood my mistake. And IMO, anything that attempts to push the idea that, maybe, allowing silent boot of unsigned bootloaders is not that bad, is actually doing a major disservice to users, as it does weaken the security of their system and, if this is really what a user wants, they can and should disable Secure Boot. Maybe we should just ask the user 'This file is not signed by Microsoft for 'Secure Boot' - do you still wish to boot from it?' md5sum 6b6daf649ca44fadbd7081fa0f2f9177 Ventoy loads Linux kernels directly, which are also signed with embedded Shim certificate. On the other hand, the expectation is that most users would only get the warning very occasionally, and you definitely want to bring to their attention that they might want to be careful about the current bootloader they are trying to boot, in case they haven't paid that much attention to where they got their image @ventoy, @pbatard, any comments on my solution? I downloaded filename Win10_21H2_BrazilianPortuguese_x64.iso Strelec WinPE) Ctrl+r for ventoy debug mode Ctrl+h or h for help m checksum a file when the user Secure Boots via MokManager - even when booting signed efi files of Ubuntu or Windows? Maybe I can get Ventoy's grub signed with MS key. WinPE10_8_Sergei_Strelec_x86_x64_2019.12.28_English.iso BOOT but Custom launcher cannot open custom path and unable access to special apps. Google for how to make an iso uefi bootable for more info. evrything works fine with legacy mode. only ventoy give error "No bootfile found for UEFI! But, currently, that is not the case at all, which means that, independently of the merits of Secure Boot for this or that type of media (which is a completely different debate altogether), there is a breach of the security contract that the user expects to see enforced and therefore something that needs to be addressed. Most of modern computers come with Secure Boot enabled by default, which is a requirement for Windows 10 certification process. ^^ maybe a lenovo / thinkpad / thinkcentre issue ? I have installed Ventoy on my USB and I have added some ISO's files : By clicking Sign up for GitHub, you agree to our terms of service and then there is no point in implementing a USB-based Secure Boot loader. If so, please include aflag to stop this check from happening! So as @pbatard said, the secure boot solution is a stopgap and that's why Ventoy is still at 1.0.XX. So, Fedora has shim that loads only Fedoras files. 2There are two methods: Enroll Key and Enroll Hash, use whichever one. After installation, simply click the Start Scan button and then press on Repair All. How to mount the ISO partition in Linux after boot ? Ventoy -Bootable USB [No-Root] - Apps on Google Play - Android Apps on