Call for hours and availability. Roger G. Taranto, Recording Secretary However, plaintiffs assert that section 204 is not at issue in this case, but under sections 201(7)(a) and 214, plaintiffs could only be excluded from the bargaining unit if the PERB designated them as "managerial" or "confidential.". Defendant argues that because the due process and equal protection clauses of the New York State Constitution do not apply to private conduct, Montalvo v. Consolidated Edison Co., 92 A.D.2d 389, 393-94, 460 N.Y.S.2d 784, 787 (N.Y.App.Div. June 4, 1996), the court found that a union was not acting under the color of state law where it had an adversarial role in relation to the state by nature of the fact that it was the representative of city employees. relating to the negotiations from January 1, 1998 to present which ultimately resulted in the Stipulation of Agreement." 411(a)(1). 1867, and is retrospective in nature. at 2.) The letter requested copies of documents pertaining to the negotiation of the collective bargaining agreement. Plaintiffs assert that Local 456 "arbitrarily and discriminatorily [sic] singled out a group of its members for removal and then declined to insist on a PERB hearing but instead consent[ed] to the removal language into a collective bargaining agreement . (Am.Complt. Teamsters Local 282 - Teamsters Local 282 Relevant sections of collective bargaining agreements between organized and management are being provided below as these agreements provide guidance to the Department when setting prevailing wage rates. Teamsters Local 294 President John Bulgaro and Secretary Treasurer Tom Quackenbush presented the Heroes Award to Glens Falls UPS member Matthew Bailey today. Defendant has moved for summary judgment on all of plaintiffs' claims pursuant to the LMRDA as well as on all of the other claims in plaintiffs' amended complaint, and plaintiffs seek partial summary judgment on their constitutional and state law claims. . The Organization represents its membership in securing employment, sustaining the standard of wages, resolving differences and maintaining harmony in employer/employee relationships and negotiating working conditions and benefits. 415. 1983 and the 14th Amendment, alleging disparate treatment between plaintiffs and other members of the bargaining unit. ( Id. 1998). GREENWICH The Representative Town Meeting has sent a new labor contract between the town and the Teamsters Local 456 back to the bargaining table after rejecting the proposed agreement. Therefore, even under New York's "more flexible State involvement requirement," plaintiffs' state constitutional due process claims fails for the same reasons their 1983 claims fail. Already a subscriber? In so doing, the Union and the County agreed to exclude plaintiffs from the bargaining unit. Teamsters Call on ArcBest to Invest in ABF Freight Workers Following Sale of FleetNet Subsidiary, Connecticut Teamsters Demand Regulations Against Amazon Warehouse Quotas, Teamsters Celebrate Womens History Month, Teamsters Applaud Introduction of PRO Act in Congress, Teamsters Continue to Monitor Proposed Change of Operations at Yellow Corp. and Seek Protections for Members. The agreement provided for raises totaling 16%; longevity increases of $600; elimination of the Senior ACA title, with a guarantee that Senior ACAs would receive the contractual raises and the ability to transfer to the title of ACA; and an agreement by the County not to seek to have any other persons or positions in the bargaining unit designated managerial or confidential until December 29, 2001. local 456 teamsters wages. 5585 0 obj
<>
endobj
(Lucyk Aff. at 24.) (Am.Complt. Average Teamsters Union Salary | PayScale Try our Advanced Search for more refined results, Searching cases in Teamsters Local 456 To obtain a copy, please file a request through our at 95-109.) Plaintiffs allege that the Union's actions resulted in the deprivation of their Fourteenth Amendment rights to due process and equal protection. Password (at least 8 characters required). In April, the County and Local 456 were at a deadlock. According to defendant, the membership of plaintiffs in Local 456 was suspended for nonpayment of dues. 2023 Nonprofit Metrics LLCTerms of Service and Privacy Policy. 424, 107 L.Ed.2d 388 (1989). 1983. Teamsters, Local 456 Leaders, Employees, and Salaries 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 $0 $25,000 $50,000 $75,000 $100,000 Avg. All members of the bargaining unit, including plaintiffs, were given an opportunity to vote on the agreement. art. purpose the improvement of wages, hours and other conditions of employment of municipal employees. LOCAL 456 160 S Central Avenue Elmsford, New York 10523 914-592-9500 Teamsters Local 456 represents workers in Westchester and Putnam Counties. ku grad school application deadline; 2020 toyota camry trd edmonton; why do crickets chirp after rain; how many jordans did tinker hatfield design; beretta 92x performance grips at 4.) v. Herzog, 269 A.D. 24, 30, 53 N.Y.S.2d 617, 622 (1945). Plaintiffs contend in their Rule 56.1 Statement that all factual allegations made in the amended complaint, except for those facts also contained in defendant's Lucyk affidavit, remain in dispute. Members for A Better Union v. Bevona, 152 F.3d 58, 65 (2d Cir. Home | Teamsters Local 456 PLEASE NOTE: A verification email will be sent to your address before you can access your trial. The Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act (LMRDA), which is enforced by the Office of Labor-Management Standards, requires labor unions to file annual reports detailing their operations. Plaintiffs allege that Local 456 failed to inform plaintiffs of their rights under the LMRDA, in violation of section 105 of the LMRDA, 29 U.S.C. Local 456 proposed that the Senior ACAs who wanted to remain in the bargaining unit should be allowed to transfer to non-senior ACA positions while retaining their higher wages. International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local Union No 456 D'Amico v. City of New York, 132 F.3d 145, 149 (2d Cir. 92-93.). at 22-23.) This is the equivalent of $1,298/week or $5,627/month. . Additional copies of the agreement were provided at the meeting, and all questions about the agreement were answered. I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email. This provision is "only a guarantee in the form of a fundamental right, of something that both legislative policy and prevailing court decisions had previously recognized." Id. ), At the third negotiation session the County agreed to give the Senior ACAs, removed from the bargaining unit, the same percentage wage increases contained in the new collective bargaining agreement. . See In the Matter of Ramapo Police Benevolent Ass'n, 33 N.Y.P.E.R.B. The parties tentatively agreed that if they were excluded, the Senior ACAs would receive contractual rates and would be allowed to transfer to the position of ACA by December 31, 1999, if they wished to remain in the bargaining unit. hb```Nf&Ad`C@; See Sharrock, 45 N.Y.2d at 160, 408 N YS.2d at 44, 379 N.E.2d 1169. On its face, section 17 does not create a cause of action for damages. ( Id. Brown merely stands for the proposition that there exists a cause of action for damages resulting from violations of the equal protection clause of the New York State Constitution. 92-93.) Union FactsUnion Facts 1997). 415. See 587 F.2d at 1391 (noting that the plaintiffs failed to raise the issue with the union, and immediately sought judicial relief, while affirming district court's dismissal of section 105 claim). 54.) ), On June 21, 1999, the ratification vote was held. of Educ. (Lucyk Aff., Ex. 265 West 14th Street at 6.) Teamsters. The claims for damages under the New York State Constitution that were sustained in Brown were against the state of New York. Rule 56.1 Stmt. Every construction worker deserves the wages and protections guaranteed by a union contract. LOCAL 456 - Teamsters Because the bargaining agreement had expired three and one-half years earlier, and the bargaining unit had not had a wage increase in that time, the Union decided that it would be in the best interest of its members to agree to the County's demands. Plaintiffs' State Constitutional Claims. 3062 (1987); In the Matter of Obdulio Brignoni, Jr., 32 N.Y.P.E.R.B. While ZipRecruiter is seeing annual salaries as high as $100,000 and as low as $45,000, the . Westchester Teamsters Municipal Employees Welfare Fund Local 456 See Adickes, 398 U.S. at 152, 90 S.Ct. The Second Circuit has stated "[t]o be viable, a claim under 101(a)(1) must therefore allege the denial of some privilege or right to vote which the union has granted to others." Plaintiffs also bring a cause of action pursuant to New York State law for breach of the duty of fair representation. Therefore, defendant's motion for summary judgment is granted as to plaintiffs' fifth cause of action. 9-20.) 2023, Portfolio Media, Inc. | About | Contact Us | Legal Jobs | Advertise with Law360 | Careers at Law360 | Terms | Privacy Policy | Cookie Settings | Help | Site Map, Teamsters Local 456 Pension, Health & Welfare, Annuity, Education & Training, Industry Advancement, and Legal Services Funds et al v. M. Velardo Enterprises, Inc. et al, Teamsters Local 456 Pension, Health & Welfare, Annuity, Education & Training, Industry Advancement, and Legal Services Funds by Louis A. Picani, Joseph Sansone, Dominick Cassanelli, Jr., Saul Singer, et al v. Koski Trucking, Inc. et al, Amalgamated Union Local 450-A Welfare Fund et al v. McKinsey & Company, Inc. et al. art. Thank you Local 456 for standing up for these workers! ( Id. According to Lucyk's affidavit, the only evidence put forth in this case, the County wanted to remove several titles from the bargaining unit, including the Senior ACAs. "Simply because the parties have cross-moved, and therefore have implicitly agreed that no material issues of fact exist, does not mean that the court must join in that agreement and grant judgment as a matter of the law for one side or the other. (Am.Complt. at 17. The County was represented by Michael Wittenberg, Director of Labor Relations. income of employees making less than $50,000 Source: LM forms filed with the Office of Labor-Management Standards. (Def. 2764, 73 L.Ed.2d 418 (1982); Parratt v. Taylor, 451 U.S. 527, 535, 101 S.Ct. New York. Broth. at 32.) Cause IQ is a website that helps companies grow, maintain, and serve their nonprofit clients, and helps nonprofits find additional foundation funding. The undisputed facts here show that the County, and not the Union, suggested and insisted upon the removal of plaintiff's job titles from the bargaining unit. Summary judgment is granted to defendant on plaintiffs' federal constitutional claims, causes of action one and two in the amended complaint. Local 456 represents many of the public workers in the City of Yonkers, the Town of Greenwich, and surrounding municipalities. at 9-10.) James J. McGrath, Trustee 3. Plaintiffs assert that on July 2, 1999, plaintiffs sent a letter to Local 456 seeking assistance, but received no response from the Union. 1940). 903, 17 L.Ed.2d 842 (1967). The Teamsters Local 456's contract with the town expired June 30, 2019. .," and this conduct constitutes a violation of LMRDA 101(a)(1) even though a subsequent vote of the membership ratified the agreement. Plaintiffs further allege that defendant discriminated against them with respect to their voting rights in violation of 101(a)(1) of the LMRDA, 29 U.S.C. Yonkers Municipal Housing and International Brotherhood of Teamsters (IBT), Local 456 (2008) (MOA) Yonkers Parking Authority and City of Yonkers Parking Authority Unit 9322, CSEA, Local 1000, AFSCME, AFL-CIO, Westchester County Local 860 (2006) York Central School Board of Education and York Central School Bus Driver Association (2002) All of the members' questions were answered. 1983), plaintiffs' claims must fail as a matter of law. ( Id. New York, finding alteration of bargaining unit did not violate 101 where excluded employees were not prevented from commencing litigation. III. On July 26, 1999, the Westchester County Board of Legislators ratified the agreement. Here, plaintiffs were not designated "managerial" or "confidential," but their job titles were removed, upon agreement between the Union and the County and with the approval of the Union membership, from the bargaining unit. The letter requested "copies of any and all documents . 89.) table of contents. Teamster Annual Salary ($67,528 Avg - Jan 2023) ZipRecruiter ( Id.). Given plaintiffs' utter lack of argument or evidence in support of these two state constitutional claims, and this Court's inability to locate any cases in which the plaintiffs were afforded compensatory or declaratory relief for violation of the relevant portion of section 17, summary judgment is granted to defendant on plaintiff's tenth and eleventh causes of action. Dominick Cassanelli Jr., Vice President Section 17 was "not intended to invalidate existing legislation which imposed a duty to bargain collectively with employees even though that obligation by reason of certain exemptions or exceptions was not in all respects coextensive with the rights of labor." You have to know whats happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. 212-924-0002 699, 705 (E.D.Pa. at 914-15. Plaintiffs also allege a violation of 101(a)(5) of the LMRDA, 29 U.S.C. Teamsters Local 456 represents workers in Westchester and Putnam Counties. We are driven by the same ideas our Union was initially founded upon: better working conditions, strong contracts, and more active member participation. 814, 820 (N.D.N.Y. Further, plaintiffs have not been prevented from commencing any litigation. Please see our Privacy Policy. Like the plaintiffs in Breininger, plaintiffs here allege that the Union negotiators were self-dealing and protecting their own job titles. Assuming, arguendo, that defendant did "arbitrarily and discriminatorily [sic] single out a group of its members for removal," plaintiffs were not denied any right to vote that was granted to others. The Union, as the representative of its membership, and the employer, have the right to negotiate to redefine the bargaining unit. Plaintiffs also allege a deprivation of their right to form, join and participate in any employee organization of their choosing in violation of the New York State Civil Service law. 411(a)(4). The union representatives on the negotiating committee submitted a counter-offer concerning the removal of the Senior ACAs. ." 1 ii work day and work week 3 iii wages and premium pay 5 iv holidays 11 v vacations 12 vi sick leave 14 vii injury leave 16 . ( Id.). 0
Sch. 411(a)(4), defendant deprived plaintiffs of the opportunity to institute an action in court or before an administrative agency. ), On October 2, 1998, the County and Local 456 resumed negotiations. (Lisa F. Colin Aff.) reciprocal rights . See United States v. Int'l Bhd. (Pl. See Stelling v. International Bhd. Contained in those reports are breakdowns of each union's spending, income and other financial information. D.) At no time after the approval of the collective bargaining agreement did Local 456 "contact, consult, advise, recommend or otherwise inform plaintiffs of their rights and remedies." 1997). july 1, 2016 2019 - june 30, 20192023 . Plaintiffs' Claims Pursuant to the United States Constitution. For the reasons stated below, defendant's motion is granted, and plaintiffs' cross motion is denied. Local 456, Teamsters, 212 N.L.R.B. 968 | Casetext (internal citation omitted). T__D6K3GiGPH4aAji9wJnz"0 Tq~mCUq@YU1h iVt B@( `P`J@d` 0@d" (X034X4D !Z29IJp )ef&
@HQ$3u$_iv 9+#0Delc9j],@m
H20qKO|1w # YM
TEAMSTERS 411(a)(4). (Pls.Mem. * This document may require redactions before it can be viewed. at 111); denial of equal protection, ( id. ELMSFORD, NY 10523, Source: Office of Labor Management Standards, Year Covered: 2019 Last Updated: April 8th, 2021, See All Employees' Compensation and Salary History. The factors courts have considered in making the state-action determination include the "source of authority for the private action," "whether the state is so entwined with the regulation of the private conduct as to constitute state activity," and "whether there has been a delegation of what has traditionally been a state function to a private person." 1996). Plaintiffs seek declaratory relief and compensatory damages for this alleged constitutional violation. Plaintiffs' briefs did not include a discussion of the merits of either of these claims. at 56.) 33, Ex. Section 101(a)(4) of the LMRDA states in relevant part: "[n]o labor organization shall limit the right of any member thereof to institute an action in any court, or in a proceeding before any administrative agency. Plaintiffs also seek declaratory relief and compensatory damages as relief for this cause of action. Denial of Equal Protection With Respect to Voting Rights, Plaintiffs also allege that defendant's conduct constituted discrimination against plaintiffs and in favor of others with respect to voting rights, in violation of section 101(a)(1) of the LMRDA, 29 U.S.C. New York, NY 10011 Every construction worker deserves the wages and protections guaranteed by a union contract. McIntyre v. Longwood Central School District. See Civil Serv. More than two dozen members of Teamsters Local 456 gathered on the steps of Mount Vernon City Hall to voice their outrage next to a giant rat as a symbol of union strength. Local 456 Rallies for Good Construction Jobs - Teamsters Cunningham v. Local 30, Int. at 5.) The Organization represents its membership in securing employment, sustaining the standard of wages, resolving differences and maintaining harmony in employer/employee relationships and negotiating working conditions and benefits. The Union's failure to "win" on every point in the negotiations, and its compromise with the County that resulted in the agreement, do not indicate that the County was so implicated in the activity so as to transform the Union's activity into state action. February 08, 2023 | New York Southern Teamsters Local 456 Pension, Health & Welfare, Annuity, Education & Training, Industry Advancement, and Legal Services Funds by Louis A. Picani, . ( Id. craft: teamster (applies only to work on the construction site) determination: nc-23-261-1 . local 456 teamsters wages - casaocho.cl (Am.Complt. income of employees making more than $50,000 Avg. Albert Liberatore, Trustee 852, Civil Serv. Joseph Sansone Secretary-Treasurer Louis A Picani President You will be notified when it is ready. 212-924-0002 Although the state and its political subdivisions, including the County, are excluded from the definition of "employer" contained in section 2 of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. Thus, plaintiffs have failed to raise a material issue of fact on their breach of duty of fair representation claim, and summary judgment is granted to defendant on this claim. 411(a)(5), for deprivation of their right to procedural protections prior to expulsion from the collective bargaining unit. (Am.Complt. (Lucyk Aff. oaklawn park track records. Teamsters Local 456, International Brotherhood of Teamsters N Y CONST. Even if plaintiffs were to put forth evidence of expulsion, it would be immaterial to defendant's conduct at issue in this case, the agreement to remove plaintiffs from the bargaining unit. Intl Brotherhood Of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers Of Americalocal 456 pays an average hourly rate of $1,644 and hourly wages range from a low of $1,416 to a high of $1,905. ( Id. EIN: 13-6804536. Room 1201 United States District Court, S.D. Plaintiffs allege that, in violation of section 101(a)(4) of the LMRDA, 29 U.S.C. 411(a)(5)." Plaintiffs base their allegations under section 101(a)(4) on their assertion that in order to remove plaintiffs from the collective bargaining unit, the County was required to request that the PERB designate the title of Senior ACA as "managerial" or confidential. Rule 56(e), to create a genuine, Full title:Kyle MCGOVERN, Linda Trentacoste Spagnuolo, Richard Cashman and William, Court:United States District Court, S.D. 1983 and the 14th Amendment of the United States Constitution. (Am.Complt. Here, it is undisputed that plaintiffs sent a letter to defendant requesting copies of documents relating to the negotiation of the new collective bargaining agreement. 80.) at 15.) Average CEO Pay Up $14.5 Million. ( Id. Want updates when International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local Union No 456 has new information, or want to find more organizations like International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local Union No 456? 424. 5599 0 obj
<>stream
80.) Plaintiffs also allege that members of the negotiating team for the Union acted in an arbitrary and discriminatory manner because some of the members had jobs that were more managerial than those of plaintiffs, but retained their position in the bargaining unit while eliminating plaintiffs' job titles. The court held that: Here, defendant was negotiating the collective bargaining agreement to benefit the entire bargaining unit because its members had not received a wage increase in more than three years. 3044 n. 7 (1992) (noting that if the bargaining unit had been fashioned by agreement between the parties, the administrative law judge may have reached a different conclusion as to whether the union's demand to alter the bargaining unit that had been certified by the PERB violated its bargaining obligation). 212-691-7074, A Year of Progress for New York Teamsters, Local 456 protests Mill Creek development, Local 456 Rallies for Good Construction Jobs, TEMP Act to Protect Workers from Extreme Heat, Governor Hochul Blocks E-Commerce Project, Saves Freeport Park, New York Heating Workers Approve Citywide Union Contract with Big Raises. In Thomas, the union informed its membership of the LMRDA's provisions after the law was enacted in 1959, but had not done so since. 183, 66 L.Ed.2d 185 (1980) To defeat defendant's motion for summary judgment, plaintiffs must present sufficient evidence to support an inference that an improper conspiracy took place. Pursuant to M.G.L. Here, plaintiffs admit that every member of the bargaining unit received a letter from the president of the Union advising them of the ratification vote for the collective bargaining agreement, and attaching a copy of the agreement. 1908, 68 L.Ed.2d 420, (1981), overruled in part on other grounds, Daniels v. Williams, 474 U.S. 327, 106 S.Ct. However, as discussed above, the County did not designate plaintiffs' job title as "managerial" or "confidential." Local 456 and Westchester County have negotiated three successive collective bargaining agreements which were effective for the two-year periods January 1, 1992 through December 31, 1993, January 1, 1994 through December 31, 1995 and January 1, 1996 through December 31, 2001. Law 201(7)(a); In the Matter of Lippman, 263 A.D.2d 891, 694 N.Y.S.2d 510 (1999), public employers and public employee unions have the right to alter by agreement the composition of their bargaining units. See Aviall, Inc. v. Ryder Sys., Inc., 913 F. Supp. Local 456, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, is a labor organization having as a primary purpose the improvement of wages, hours and other conditions of employment of municipal employees. After months of negotiations, and repeated refusal by the County to keep Senior ACAs in the bargaining unit, the Union's negotiators feared an impasse. ( Id. Local 456 members also deliver fuel oil and gas and drive school buses. Defendant argues that although expulsion is a form of discipline under section 101(a)(5), plaintiffs have failed to demonstrate that there was a punitive aspect to their removal from the bargaining unit. I, 6. 1976), the court construed "discipline" to "conform to the essential character of the specifically enumerated types of discipline: fine, expulsion, and suspension." When faced with a motion for summary judgment, the non-moving party may not rely simply on conclusory allegations or speculation to avoid summary judgment, but instead must offer evidence to show that "its version of the events is not wholly fanciful." In Civil Service Bar Association, the union filed a grievance on behalf of all attorneys affected after the city hired an associate attorney at a salary $3,000 higher than the stated minimum salary for that position. 83.) Additional copies of the agreement were provided and the agreement was read to the membership. Teamsters Joint Council 39 Endorses Janet Protasiewicz for Wisconsin Supreme Court. gabriel iglesias volkswagen collection. WILLIAM C. CONNER, Senior District Judge. On January 4, 2000, the court ordered that the documents be preserved. . Dialectic is based in Guelph, Ontario, Canada. ( Id. We are driven by a single goal; to do our part in making the workplace a better place for all and ensure we create the best environment to ensure a better life for our members. Id. In the past 10 years, CEO pay at S&P 500 companies increased more than $500,000 a year to an average of $14.5 million in 2018. ( Id. Because plaintiffs were given the same opportunity as all the other members of the bargaining unit to ask questions about and vote on the agreement, plaintiffs cannot state a claim for a violation of 101(a)(1). (Lucyk Aff., Ex. ( Id. Local 456 made several attempts to retain plaintiffs' title in the bargaining unit after the County submitted the proposal to remove plaintiffs from the bargaining unit. Trustees of Columbia Univ. Agritronics Corp. v. National Dairy Herd Ass'n, 914 F. Supp. LEXIS 7621, at *26, 1996 WL 296538 (E.D.Pa. 826, 828 (S.D.N.Y. (Pls.Mem. Employees Ass'n, 95 A.D.2d 800, 463 N.Y.S.2d 519 (1983). SHAD Alliance v. Smith Haven Mall, 66 N.Y.2d 496, 505, 488 N.E.2d 1211, 1217, 498 N.Y.S.2d 99, 105 (1985) (citations omitted); see also Sharrock, 45 N.Y.2d at 157, 408 N.Y.S.2d at 45, 379 N.E.2d 1169 (state action exists where State delegates "one of the essential attributes of sovereignty"). By Order dated January 4, 2000, the New York State Supreme Court ordered that the documents be preserved, but did not order production. After the grievance was denied, the union took the matter to arbitration, where the arbitrator ruled in favor of the union and ordered the city to increase all minimum salaries. Id. Louis Picani, President 493 U.S. at 94, 110 S.Ct. Compensation of CEOs at nonprofit hospitals, Impact of COVID-19 on Nonprofits: What 2021 Form 990 data shows, Net gain from sale of non-inventory assets, International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local Union No 456. In Miller v. Holden, 535 F.2d 912, 914-15 (5th Cir. Further, plaintiffs have not articulated how the Union's negotiation of a collective bargaining agreement, which was approved by a vote of the entire membership, violated their right to organize or bargain collectively. at 10. (Am. hbbd``b`Y
$@i!`b9d@hD A*
at 15. ), On October 29, 1997, the County and Local 456 reached a Stipulation of Agreement that provided that the County would not seek to have any of the positions or persons in the bargaining unit designated as managerial or confidential. ELMSFORD, NY 10523-3521 | Tax-exempt since Nov. 1982. Casetext, Inc. and Casetext are not a law firm and do not provide legal advice. at 27. Even if plaintiffs put forth evidence in support of these allegations, which they have failed to do, the negotiators' personal interests do not demonstrate that the Union, as an organizational entity, intended to punish plaintiffs by agreeing to remove them from the bargaining unit. . 34.) at 12. 1978); Broomer v. Schultz, 239 F. Supp. at 23.). Defendant asserts that under section 204, the Union is authorized to remove job titles from a bargaining unit pursuant to agreement with the employer. at 28-29.) Union FactsUnion Facts Region Assigned: Mount Vernon municipal workers demand city pay for overtime wages Hence, the threshold inquiry under the New York State Constitution is essentially whether the state has been sufficiently implicated in the challenged activity to transform such activity into state action.